During a facility transition, the specialized tables used to build our largest product were replaced with a new supplier-built design that addressed the table structure but left much of the required mechanical functionality unresolved. With the new tables already being fabricated and installed, I had to work within locked-in design constraints to develop a workable motion system, integrate critical support hardware, and help bring the first machines online under a very aggressive timeline. What began as a fast-turn recovery effort evolved into a broader redesign involving mechanism development, operator-driven improvements, electrical integration support, and an ongoing long-term CAD solution for high-duty production use.
By the time I took over this portion of the project, the new table structures were already being built and installed by the supplier, so many of the major packaging decisions were fixed. The existing design covered the base table but did not fully account for the motion hardware needed to make the system functional. Motor placement, shaft reach, and support geometry all created additional challenges, so the task quickly became less about designing from scratch and more about engineering a workable system around locked-in constraints.
To get the first machines running quickly, I had to design around what could actually be sourced in time rather than what would have been ideal on paper. Proper #25 chain track had a lead time of several weeks, so I sourced a workable alternative through McMaster-Carr and designed custom 3D-printed mounts to integrate both the rail and the fabricated track into the system. I used UHMW for the guide hardware, drawing on prior experience with the material from skateboard building to develop a practical low-friction solution. I also designed and printed ABS tensioners and roller guides that used inexpensive press-fit skateboard bearings, which were far more cost-effective and easier to source quickly than comparable bearings from McMaster-Carr. That allowed me to build a functional system rapidly using parts that were affordable, replaceable, and readily available.
One of the biggest challenges in the interim system was managing the chain path within the inherited table layout. The installed brackets and surrounding geometry did not leave much room for straightforward lower chain support, so I had to develop a C-shaped support approach that allowed the chain to route around those constraints while still providing guidance and stability. To further stabilize the system, I used stainless wire, crimped fittings, and turnbuckle tensioners to introduce adjustable support and added tension where needed. I also designed printed tensioners, idlers, and guide components to help control sag, maintain chain tracking, and keep the mechanism operating reliably under load.
After the supplier had already built a version of the earlier table design, an updated concept was proposed that relied on a multi-rail system with sliding shafts for the tensioner mechanism. I could tell that approach would be difficult to fabricate accurately and even harder to keep functioning reliably once real-world clearances, alignment, and wear came into play. Because the supplier-built structure and plate layout were already in place, I also had to work around the existing mounting geometry rather than start with a clean-sheet design. Instead of continuing down a path that was likely to be complex and fragile, I developed a simpler concept built around an industrial door slide and custom 3D-printed holders that could integrate with the existing plate arrangement. Once the concept was clear, I moved directly into fabrication, welding and building the hardware the same day while also printing the supporting components needed to make the system functional.
Using this approach, I was able to get all four tables operational within the required timeline and support the startup of the new systems without delaying production. Over the following two months, the machines remained in regular use, and while a few minor issues surfaced during operation, each one was small enough to diagnose and correct in under 15 minutes. That quick response helped keep production running while the interim hardware continued to prove itself in real use. Although I had to shift attention toward other higher-priority projects during that time, I also continued improving the design in the background and developed a new set of fully metal fabricated tensioners with a more robust overall approach.
While developing the probe table, I was responsible for troubleshooting the electrical layout and improving the wiring setup needed to support testing and assembly work. This included tracing wiring issues, identifying problem areas in the existing setup, and helping organize the power distribution so the table could be used more safely and reliably during production and development work.
As part of the process, I worked through the outlet layout, wiring paths, and electrical hardware placement with a focus on keeping the system clean, serviceable, and aligned with proper electrical installation practices. The goal was to turn the probe table from a rough working setup into a more dependable workstation that could support repeatable testing without creating unnecessary safety or maintenance issues.
During the probe table redesign, I improved the chain drive system by re-engineering the tensioner brackets and adding a double-shear mount to the motor sprocket drive. The updated tensioner brackets provided a stiffer and more adjustable mounting solution, making it easier to set chain tension accurately while reducing unwanted movement during operation.
The double-shear motor sprocket mount was added to better support the drive side of the system and reduce bending loads caused by the chain tension. This created a stronger mechanical interface, improved sprocket alignment, and made the drive assembly more reliable for repeated production use.
To move the design forward, we held a meeting with the owner of our local sheet metal manufacturer to review the table layout and determine the best fabrication approach for the updated components. After finalizing the direction, I sent the revised parts out for fabrication. The first production-style components are currently being built for fitment and functional testing, allowing the new tensioner geometry, motor sprocket support, and chain-drive alignment to be verified before final implementation.